Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 01.07.2025 04:26
Just in the last 5 years:
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
How has Donald Trump turned the Taylor Swift endorsement into a win for him?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
People with COPD had more carbon in their lungs than smokers in study - The Washington Post
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
A year later, Trump continues to appeal his historic criminal case. Here's what we know - NPR
What’s next?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
4 foods that can lower blood pressure naturally, according to a top cardiologist - Times of India
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
‘Stronger’ and ‘On Muscle’: What Goes to Work When We Work Out - WSJ
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Thank you.
Russia can stop this any time.
What are the challenges associated with the birth narratives of Jesus?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
This Week In Space podcast: Episode 165 — Guardians of Space - Space